Washington, D.C., pollster Andrew Myers said he recently finished a poll for a private group that shows voters overwhelmingly supporting the measure.
But a poll from Texas pollster David Hill, commissioned by the group fighting against the initiative, has voters opposing the measure.
Both sides declined to release the complete details and results of their multi-question polls.
Well the last sentence isn't entirely true, Hill released his results to the Republican blog "Face The State" on Monday,
A telephone survey of 802 Colorado voters was conducted by Texas pollster David Hill of Hill Research Consultants May 27 through 29. It shows that just 38 percent of respondents support the proposal, while 44 percent are opposed and 19 percent remain undecided.
That's a serious deficit, if the numbers are accurate and that is a big if.
With no details as to the margin of error or how many Republicans, Independents and Democrats were sampled it's impossible to judge the accuracy of Hill's poll. While the Hill Research group has a nominally bi-partisan client list they are generally considered a GOP friendly firm having done work in the past for Tom DeLay, Elizabeth Dole and Katherine Harris, to name just a few. Hill also writes a partisan column for the D.C. newspaper "The Hill." Given that Hill refused to release his results to Politics West but happily allowed Face The State to publish them it's probably safe to assume that Face The State or a similar GOP-friendly entity commissioned the poll in question. Essentially David Hill's poll is worthless for anyone attempting to honestly ascertain the status of the proposed initiative.
The Andrew Myers poll is probably equally suspect. Myers does polling for groups on the left, including unions like AFL-CIO and AFSCME so one imagines that his poll was also commissioned by a partisan source.
The truth of the matter is we simply have no idea right now what the true status of the proposed initiative is.
2 comments:
You say:
"Given that Hill refused to release his results to Politics West but happily allowed Face The State to publish them . . .."
I am David Hill. I haven't "refused" Politics West or "happily allowed" Face the State.
Please get your facts straight, sirs. If anyone contacted me, I would happily give them any poll's methodology that is cleared for public release. It is my duty as an AAPOR member.
To your first point, take it up with Politics West editor Stephen Keating. I accurately characterized what Keating reported, that you declined to release the details of your poll.
Whether you released the results to FTS happily or not is an editorial point on my part that you're free to contest but really has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
I notice that in your indignant comment that you will release results but only those that are "cleared for public release." Well then I have to ask why you are being so self-righteous in your comment? It appears from your statement that you didn't release the results because they have not been "cleared for public release." Am I wrong?
It certainly looks as though you're leaving yourself an out on a technicality right after you self-righteously attack what I wrote.
Post a Comment